[NetworkTheoryAppliedResearchInstitute]

The seventh task, added to the list during review. The introduction asserts both halves of the issuance argument with no citation, while the companion article makes the same two claims and sources them — so the authoritative instrument is the weaker cited of the two.

The sentence

Before. ...transform the issuance model from exogenous, chartal money (issued by an authority outside the community) to endogenous mutual credit (issued by members to one another as they transact).

After. ...transform the issuance model from exogenous, chartal money — issued by an authority outside the community (Knapp, 1924) — to endogenous mutual credit, issued by members to one another as they transact (Moore, 1988; Greco, 2009).

Both glosses survive intact; they moved out of parentheses so the citations could take that slot without stacking two sets of brackets.

References added

Taken verbatim from jfa-structure-article.md's own source list, so the two documents agree rather than drifting into two spellings of the same entry:

• Greco, T. H. (2009). The End of Money and the Future of Civilization. Chelsea Green Publishing.
• Knapp, G. F. (1924). The State Theory of Money. Macmillan. (Original work published 1905)
• Moore, B. J. (1988). Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money. Cambridge University Press.

Filed alphabetically among the existing four.

No new claims

The sentence says exactly what it said before. This adds attribution, not argument. INTRO-endogenous keeps its anchor phrase endogenous mutual credit contiguous, and conformance passes locally and in CI.

This closes the review

All seven are now open: #9, #10, #11, #12, #13 and this one.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[NetworkTheoryAppliedResearchInstitute]

Translations: after adoption. Required by CONTRIBUTING ## Translations and missing from my original description — flagging it late rather than not at all.

The English is authoritative and still under review. These seven amendments touch overlapping parts of the introduction, principles, layer bodies and references, so translating each separately would mean seven passes over seven languages against text that may still change in review. Recommend one translation pass covering every adopted amendment once this review closes.

[NetworkTheoryAppliedResearchInstitute]

Landed on main in the squash of #18, which carried the September editorial stack (#9-#14 with their review-stack conflict fixes), the amendments of #15 and #16, and Act 1 of the amendment plan of 2026-10-07. Closed rather than merged only because main requires linear history, so the squash could not mark the stack's heads as merged.