[NetworkTheoryAppliedResearchInstitute]

Proposed amendment to the bylaws under Article XV. Nothing here is adopted. P1-001_Bylaws_v1.0.md is untouched and stays operative until the delegates vote under §15.1.

What is in this PR

• P1-001_Amendment_v1.1_2026-09-22.md — the instrument the delegates vote on. Twenty items, each naming what it depends on, plus the §15.2 check, the provenance rows, and an adoption record left blank.
• P1-001_Bylaws_v1.1-draft.md — v1.0 with the twenty items applied, so the amended instrument can be read whole.

How to review it

The first commit opens the draft as a verbatim copy of v1.0. Each of the twenty items that follows is its own commit, in the instrument's order, so the commit list reads as the item list and each item's diff is exactly that item. The instrument says the items may be adopted as a whole or item by item; the commits are cut the same way.

Reviewing commit by commit is the intended path — the "Files changed" view shows the draft as a new file and will not be informative.

Checks run

• Every item applied by exact string match, asserted to occur exactly once in the file. A silent miss or a double hit was not possible.
• A cross-check reads the instrument's own blockquotes and confirms all 67 amended/inserted sentences appear in the draft, and that none of the 43 struck sentences survived except those the instrument republishes unchanged in a restatement. Result: PASS.
• P1-001_Bylaws_v1.0.md is byte-identical to main.

Sequencing — this cannot be adopted first

Items 2 through 12 and 18 rest on the amendment to the official document of the same date, and Item 16 depends on its §2 for §15.2 protection. That amendment is NTARI-RAND/Janus#15 and must be adopted and recorded before this one. Adopted in the other order, the bylaws would exceed the official document for the interval between the two acts.

Open points for the reviewer

• Item 13 excludes a platform's own prosumers from its witness seats. The instrument flags this as a design choice and invites striking that clause if the substrate market is judged too thin for it.
• Item 3 also corrects heirarcy → hierarchy inside its restatement. That is not listed in Item 20, which covers only sections the amendment does not otherwise restate.
• The §10.9 provenance row cites the Covenant Layer, not its orchestrator tier — the sentences moved in the editorial revision of 2026-09-17 (Janus#9). One commit, and the appendix is informative, not operative.
• Translations under P2-002 follow adoption; the seven translated copies of v1.0 are untouched and will be stale against v1.1 until then.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[NetworkTheoryAppliedResearchInstitute]

Superseded by #4 (decided 2026-09-30): the consistency pass carried the September amendment forward as the current v1.1 line, and the amendment plan of 2026-10-07 restores in #4 what it did not carry (the ratification gate, the witness rules, and the §10.7 scoping). The September instrument remains in this PR's history and in the Historical Docs drafting record.