Repository navigation
Preserve donor audit evidence during targeted refreshes - #39
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A targeted conversation audit in a fresh worktree can have a committed cross-repository inventory but no ignored raw cache. Previously, fetching Pakar alone regenerated the inventory from only that cache, dropping 778 PCController/Pealayer records. The deletion was caught before commit during the PortableShell preservation audit.
Merge refreshed repository/number entries into the existing inventory and retain untouched records and their exact review evidence. Scope text distinguishes historical retained evidence from refreshed records. Fetching still never promotes manual review, and pagination/failure checks remain intact. The restored inventory contains 816 records across all three repositories.
Validation: focused audit tests cover empty/partial/full refreshes, replacement without duplication, preservation of other donors and review state. An actual targeted cached refresh preserved all 778 donor records. Existing donor comparison hashes were updated only for the reread tool, tests and coordination document. No firmware, client runtime, board or unrelated draft PR is changed. Relates to #3.