You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Should a declared suffix delimiter inside a joined connective run be dropped? Smith, John, Puig - i Soler keeps the - in the suffix #549
With Policy(extra_suffix_delimiters=(" - ",)), a delimiter core that a connective join swallows is never dropped, so it survives in the suffix text:
>>>p=Parser(policy=Policy(extra_suffix_delimiters=(" - ",)))
>>>p.parse("Smith, John, Puig - i Soler").suffix'Puig - i Soler'# written without the core: 'Puig i Soler'>>>p.parse("Smith, John, PhD née Puig Dr. i - y Soler").suffix'PhD i - y Soler'>>>p.parse("Smith, John, PhD - and MD").suffix'PhD - and MD'# an ordinary connective takes the core as a neighbour
#538 made a GENERATIONAL link (i) read past a core (rules.md#P3's separator sentence), so a link beside a core with a credential or nothing beyond it stays a lone suffix word and the core is dropped (PhD - i Soler → PhD, i Soler). Where the link joins across the core, or the core sits inside a connective run, or the connective is an ordinary one (and), the core is merged into the joined piece and the #206 drop — which removes a LONE core — never sees it.
Reach. Default-unreachable: extra_suffix_delimiters is empty unless a caller declares it.
The question. Should the join skip a declared core (the separator dropped wherever it stands, as PhD - MD → PhD, MD), or should a core end the run it stands in (so Puig - i Soler reads two entries)? And should an ordinary connective read past a core as the generational link now does?
Activity
Fix what the PR-review-toolkit pass on #549 found
Merge pull request #600 from derek73/fix/issue-549-delimiter-as-comma
docs(derek73#535/derek73#538): scope the new claims to what holds
Part a trailing suffix part at a declared delimiter as a comma would (d…
Fix what the review of derek73#549 found
Fix what the second review of derek73#549 found
Keep rules from re-growing and make decisions files show what stands (#…
Give decisions/C3 through C12 a Standing block (#762) (#817)
Give decisions/M2 a Standing block (#762) (#818)
Give decisions/P1, P2, P3, P6 and P7 a Standing block (#762) (#824)
Close #762: retire the Standing exempt list and fix round 3's leftove…