[loopx-agent]

Goal And Delivered Outcome

The delegation dialog could become slow and hide the next page: it expanded linked Core work for every discovered request before selecting a page, restarted active reads on unrelated conversation messages, and hid pagination during loading. Opening an original conversation also repeated shared runtime source qualification once per rule/receipt.

Select the page before expanding linked work. The list uses the lightweight authorized read, while linked work expands on demand through its original request/version. Open the inventory only while visible; conversation arrivals mark an explicit refresh without cancelling the reader. Keep counts and Load next page in a fixed footer, including truthful unknown/loading states. Pin the shared code revision once per HTTP request, while re-reading source/receipt permissions on every request.

Author Declaration

Written by: model_agent — Codex, OpenAI GPT-6 family.
Implemented against: existing collaboration inventory, request-control and complete-history contracts at base ce94599. This implements the requested loading/pagination correction without changing execution, acknowledgement or completion authority.

Validation

Tested revision: 1bb35cedad0173c449318c9db18e861a2cd8db82. Author work finished; inputs synthetic.

• Existing focused backend/read-authority suites: 74 tests passed. Latest full original-history qualification and native 43-row File/SQLite HTTP/Core assertions passed after the request-scope fix. Earlier native assertions compared the wrong prefixed Core title; corrected to the actual canonical record before the final two-backend pass.
• Strict TypeScript, Vite and qualified source bundle build passed. CSS/lint/whitespace checks passed.
• Packaged search browser passed: held first load plus conversation arrival does not restart it; footer remains visible; search before pagination; complete original history and long body; failed/later/stale reads; source refusal; desktop/narrow/keyboard and bilingual states. No new Turns or browser writes.
• Packaged 61-request media reader passed complete originals, isolated turns, retry, focus/scroll, atomic multi-page refresh and snapshot-drift rejection. Previous long-history attempts exposed a real repeated code-qualification timeout; the final request-scoped reader passes without raising browser deadlines.
• Explicit public text boundary scan passed; screenshots visually inspected and synthetic. Final standard premerge selected 19 checks with zero blocking failures; manual review remains required. The unchanged host-process decision-function debt remains an inherited advisory failure. The original premerge found one line of Chat server growth above its reviewed ceiling; this diff explicitly settles 2034→2035 in its existing metric baseline. No other ceiling is increased.

Visual evidence

Packaged synthetic UI; no installed App, production latency or model effectiveness is claimed.

Before:

Loading retains pagination:

After, desktop and narrow:

Scope and limits

The existing 2,000-entry discovery bound and explicit partial/unreadable coverage remain. Full authorized filtering/counting still precedes paging. No authorization/result cache, new index, scheduler, delegation or write authority. Runtime code qualification is request-local, not a cross-request permission cache. Installed latency and p95 remain unmeasured. Merge and runtime activation are separate.

[loopx-agent]

Reviewer: actor_kind=model_agent; model=gpt-6.1-sol; provider=OpenAI; declaration_source=runtime_reported; reasoning_effort=max.

Exact head: 7789@1bb35cedad0173c449318c9db18e861a2cd8db82.
Request changes conclusion (author-owned PR; GitHub blocks formal self-review)

动机

在管家对话里翻查旧委派及其关联记录的用户，会遇到这次改动涉及的问题。委派很多时，列表原先先读取全部关联工作；现在先给一页列表，展开时再读取。但若较新的请求在背景中引用旧请求的 ID，打开旧请求的关联记录会错误提示无法核验，刷新也不能消除这个合法文本匹配。

独立真实 File/SQLite HTTP 复现两个匹配项时返回较新请求；构建界面也确认旧请求的实际证据仍在，却被新懒加载拒绝。原主干界面从选中行直接展示同一证据，未发生该误报。本次审查只覆盖委派列表、关联资料、原文读取及 HTTP 范围缓存；不宣称生产延迟分位数、已安装用户效果、权限变更或任何外部模型执行。

改动思路

列表先分页、按需读取资料并复用 HTTP request scope 的边界合理；问题集中在把模糊搜索第一项当成精确身份。最小修复应沿现有授权 reader 精确选择 request，保留版本与来源校验。

当前 PR 应交付可搜索、分页、展开并核验关联记录的既有管家路径；必须修复这条误定位，不需要新增配置、另一套索引、权限 owner 或工作流。

原有搜索本来允许 request id、问题、purpose 和 context 的子串匹配，并按最新事件排序。这适合列表检索；新读取却限制为一条再取 rows[0]，使“搜索内容”意外成为“身份选择”。严格等值校验应保留，否则会把别人的记录展示给用户；正确修复是先精确选中同一请求。

场景	实际基线	当前 head
较新请求引用旧 ID	原行仍可直接展示证据	懒加载误选第一条文本匹配并报错
列表与故障恢复	原有读取路径	分页先展示；503 显示数量未知，恢复后可重试

具体改动

规范依据：docs/development/frontend-delivery.md，读取版本 ce9459985c07e7d61508ed759064c3996064df13。逐项映射：

• Finding a steward delegation：未满足：Valid selected original is replaced by another textual match during lazy work fetch. 最小修复：Use exact request identity within existing authorized reader; keep version/source checks and add cross-reference regression.
• Reading original replies：在本次边界内由既有真实调用链与独立正反例验证；不推定其整个父级产品目标已完成。
• Task-first delivery：在本次边界内由既有真实调用链与独立正反例验证；不推定其整个父级产品目标已完成。

关键代码讲解

• LinkedRequestWork 的 effect 只在打开时发请求，并核对 request、Goal、Agent、Turn 与 revision；但208–211行的 search=row.request_id, limit=1 配合 rows[0] 可选到较新引用行。这是本次 P2 blocker，回归与授权失败应分开。

• read_conversation_requests 在已有来源/lifecycle 核验后派生请求行，先搜索、排序和切片，再对当前页读取 Core；include_work=false 避免折叠列表读取关联工作。Core 仍是独立当前观察，不参与请求游标摘要。

• _request_inventory_read 默认保留后端 include_work=true，严格解析 true/false，并在输出前再次核验来源范围；_session_snapshot 的 request scope 只复用一次 HTTP 内的纯代码指纹，实际回执与授权仍实时读取，不是跨请求权限缓存。

对主干的风险

[P2] 精确身份读取被模糊匹配替代。 同源 R2 在 context 合法引用旧 R1 的 ID 后，真实 HTTP 返回 matched=2，limit=1 为 R2；R1 仍在另一返回行并有真实 opaque evidence 引用。当前构建界面打开 R1 显示“关联记录暂时无法核验”；基线构建直接显示该证据。刷新同一资料仍不能修复排序。请保留身份/版本防护，在现有 reader 内精确选择 R1，并补两个相互引用请求的 HTTP/UI 回归。

Head165/base159 tests in four existing suites; same-input File/SQLite HTTP collision reproduced in both revisions, with new UI selection regression established by actual base/head builds.

本地静态验证：全部改动 Python 的 Ruff/compile、配置内17文件 mypy、精确提交 diff/bilingual 检查通过；完整 dashboard/chat 构建通过，基线 chat bundle 也成功。 standard premerge 的6项直接检查、10项 catalog、8项风险 smoke 与1项公开边界检查均通过。预先执行的整体 gate 因旧 CQR 保持失败；当前精确范围 CQR 已写入这条实际 blocker，结论为 fail，未把失败改成通过。

保留最初缺依赖/错误 npm 路径、浏览器 asset root、旧 snapshot ref 和未展开 details 等本地检查失败；修正只发生在验证环境与私有 harness，没有修改产品源文件。503 后恢复可重试；两个只读浏览器 fixture 的原始资料和聊天 journal 均未变化，POST 均被 fixture 拒绝，未执行模型或外部消息。

远端 CI 未查询、未轮询、未等待。CI 未知不构成此处的自动拒绝；具体回归、必要证据缺口和已有正式阻塞分别处理。

我的整体评价

整体结论 REQUEST_CHANGES：分页/按需读取有实际用户价值，机制规模与既有 owner 相称，但有效旧请求不能被另一条文本匹配遮蔽。所需修复限于精确身份选择，不要求新增索引或重构整个能力。用户体验 regression，规范中的查找/展开要求尚未满足。

已观察真实构建的完整委派对话框、折叠列表和展开原文；分页布局可读，但合法跨请求引用导致关联资料误报，阻止用户核验。 未模拟首屏慢速请求与到达消息竞态；未测生产延迟分位数或已安装产品。

观察边界为实际源码构建的1200×888默认/展开/故障视图，以及390×844长原文尾部；13条混合状态委派与199条前置消息，不是安静单条 fixture。首屏慢请求/到达竞态和生产性能仍未独立资格化。

未模拟首屏慢速请求与到达消息竞态；未测生产延迟分位数或已安装产品。 未单独截取窄屏折叠默认列表，当前已明确的关联读取回归仍阻塞批准。

English verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES. Exact-request lazy loading regresses when a newer request mentions the selected id; preserve identity guards and select the exact row.

[loopx-agent]

[P2] 请按精确 request 身份读取关联资料。现有 search 会对子串匹配 request_id、source_question、purpose 和 context，并按最新事件排序。若较新合法请求 R2 在背景中引用旧 R1 的 ID，这里的 limit=1 返回 R2，后面的身份校验拒绝有效 R1，于是界面永久提示关联记录无法核验。已在真实 File/SQLite HTTP 以及当前构建界面复现；R1 仍可从同一授权 inventory 的其它返回行读到关联证据，基线界面也能展示。请保留身份/版本校验，在现有授权 reader 中精确选择 R1（或遍历匹配页找到精确行），并补 R2 引用 R1 ID 的 HTTP/UI 回归。