Skip to content

fix(compare): keep Cowork, Make, and Langflow facts consistent within each profile - #9585

Merged
waleedlatif1 merged 4 commits into
stagingfrom
fix/compare-release-review-followups
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

waleedlatif1 merged 4 commits into
stagingfrom
fix/compare-release-review-followups

Conversation

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Cowork: every scheduling, durability, alerting, and unattended-execution fact now carries the same exception, that tasks on local files or apps still need the desktop app open and the computer awake
  • Make: the free tier no longer quotes a second app count (3,500+) beside the profile's 3,000+ figure; the count lives in the integrations fact
  • Langflow: the integrations short value keeps IBM's 100+ claim separate from the ~80 documented bundles
  • Follow-ups from the release PR v0.9.41: browser extension, ci improvements #9579 review

Type of Change

  • Bug fix

Testing

Data-only change; biome on the three files. Make figures re-checked against make.com's integrations and pricing pages (both list 3,000+; the pricing plan table also says 3,500+ standard apps).

Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • Self-reviewed my changes
  • Tests added/updated and passing (new tests pass the test-audit authoring gate)
  • No new warnings introduced
  • I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms outlined in the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated
docs Skipped Skipped Nov 2, 2026 11:15pm UTC

Request Review

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 3 files

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

RetriggerView in GreptileConfidence Score: 5/5

[Low impact] This PR appears safe to merge.

Summary

This PR makes the three comparison profiles more consistent.

  • Cowork facts keep local-file and app tasks tied to an awake desktop.
  • Langflow’s integration summary separates IBM’s claim from documented bundles.
  • Make’s free-plan detail names standard apps without adding another count.

The earlier alert-summary finding is fixed: failureAlerting.shortValue now preserves the local-task exception. No new actionable issues were found.

Reviews (4) · Last reviewed commit: "fix(compare): carry the local-task excep..." · Reviewed by Greptile

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@greptile

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@cubic-dev-ai

cubic-dev-ai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reported issues were addressed across 3 files

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@greptile

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@cubic-dev-ai

cubic-dev-ai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reported issues were addressed across 3 files

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@greptile

@waleedlatif1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@cubic-dev-ai

cubic-dev-ai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 3 files

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic

@waleedlatif1
waleedlatif1 merged commit 6eac47d into staging Nov 2, 2026
50 checks passed
@waleedlatif1
waleedlatif1 deleted the fix/compare-release-review-followups branch November 2, 2026 23:17

This branch was previously deployed

1 inactive deployment
Preview — 2b98acc8 Deployed Nov 2, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant