Repository navigation
✨ make ClusterObjectSet spec.progressionProbes immutable once set #3036
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
openshift-merge-bot
merged 1 commit into
operator-framework:main
from
perdasilva:cos-progressionprobes-immutable
Oct 20, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
🔎 Supported by static analysis
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: operator-framework/operator-controller
Length of output: 16733
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: operator-framework/operator-controller
Length of output: 684
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: operator-framework/operator-controller
Length of output: 17749
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: operator-framework/operator-controller
Length of output: 28776
🌐 Web query:
Kubernetes CustomResourceDefinition CEL field-level validation rule omitted field oldSelf transition rule semantics💡 Result:
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: operator-framework/operator-controller
Length of output: 28752
Enforce immutability at the spec level.
The field-level CEL rule is skipped when an optional field is omitted from the new object. An update can therefore remove existing
progressionProbes.MinItems=1also makes the documented “even if empty” case invalid forprogressionProbes.Apply the same correction to
phases, which has the same removal gap. Add tests that set each field and then clear it. Regenerate the CRDs, manifests, and apply configurations.Suggested source change
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents